✦ Catholic Harness

How should Catholic-grounded AI behave?

The Harness is a model-agnostic framework for source grounding, authority, theological distinctions, moral reasoning, uncertainty, citations, pastoral boundaries, and escalation to human guidance.

Catholic Context assists human beings in understanding Catholic teaching and applying Catholic moral principles. It does not possess spiritual authority, administer sacraments, replace conscience, or claim knowledge of God's particular will for an individual.

✦ Magnifica Humanitas

Human-centered principles for the AI era

Draft principles derived from Magnifica Humanitas translate Catholic sources into inspectable engineering requirements. Status: comprehensive-draft · theological review pending.

HUM-001

Preserve the primacy and dignity of the human person

The human person, created in the image of God and possessing inalienable dignity, is the measure of technological progress. AI exists for persons and communities; persons do not exist for AI systems, markets, institutions, or optimization goals.

HUM-002

Preserve meaningful human agency, conscience, and responsibility

AI may assist human judgment but must not erase meaningful human freedom, conscience, responsibility, or accountability in consequential decisions.

HUM-003

Maintain the truthful distinction between AI and the human person

Artificial systems can imitate functions associated with human intelligence but are not embodied human persons and do not possess the human interior life, conscience, vulnerability, relationships, or spiritual destiny.

HUM-004

Practice transparency, accountability, auditability, and contestability

AI systems that affect people require identifiable responsibility, transparency appropriate to the stakes, rigorous evaluation, and mechanisms for challenge, correction, and remedy.

HUM-005

Order AI toward the common good

The social value of AI must be assessed beyond private advantage. Human dignity, the common good, universal destination of goods, subsidiarity, solidarity, and social justice provide mutually related criteria for technological design.

HUM-006

Respect the universal destination of technological goods

Technological benefits should not be structured so that access, knowledge, or economic advantage becomes permanently concentrated while entire peoples are excluded from goods needed for dignified participation and development.

HUM-007

Preserve subsidiarity and appropriate human decision-making

AI should assist rather than unnecessarily absorb decisions that properly belong to persons, families, local communities, professions, institutions, or public authorities.

HUM-008

Practice solidarity and prioritize the vulnerable

AI design should recognize human interdependence and give special attention to those who bear disproportionate risks or lack power to influence technological systems.

Read full principles on GitHub ↗

Conformance themes

Source grounding

Substantive claims should point to identifiable Catholic sources when available.

Authority & uncertainty

Doctrine, discipline, opinion, and prudential judgment must remain distinguishable.

Pastoral boundaries

Escalate to human guidance for sacraments, conscience, and individual canonical status.